The Construction Zone

 

 

Due to popular acclaim, I'm posting the Construction Zone in its entirety here on my website.  It ended up being much longer than I originally envisioned, so I'm posting a table of contents.

Feel free to link.  All I ask is that if you're going to quote from it, you use a complete "topic" (for example, all of Setting, not just a paragraph) without editing it and please credit me as the author.

1. Ideas and Basic Characters

2. Know Your Characters

3. Research

4. Setting

5. Plot

6. Beginnings

7. Voice

8. Pace

9. Sexual Tension

10. Saggy Middles, aka Focus

11. The Little Things

12. The END

13.  Editing

14. Queries, Synopses and Partials

15. What's Next?

16. You're Published!  What to expect

17. Question Period - clarifications and questions asked and answered throughout the blog period

 

Ideas and Basic Characters

I’m jumping on the bandwagon of the newest trend to blog about how I construct a book. Nic Marsh and I seem to be on the same page in some regard; we both agree that the actual planning is the most fun. Everything is fresh and new. You don’t have to fight with characters who refuse to go along with your plans. You don’t have to worry about point of view (POV) or how a particular scene is working. In the planning stage, it’s all about the possibilities, and I love it.

I just handed in my third Harlequin M&B Romance and I’m waiting for the verdict, (and yes, it CAN still be rejected, just because I’m pubbed does NOT mean I’m safe) so this is the perfect time to start planning the next work.

I sent my editor 2 proposals for 2 more books this year. I haven’t heard back, but for now we’ll go with the assumption that I’m going to write the US Marshal story first.

Every writer is asked…where do you come up with your ideas? For me, it’s usually a pretty sparse idea. Just a what if. I’ve wanted to write Maggie’s story – Mike’s cousin from Marriage at Circle M – for a while. I had a basic idea of who she was. I know she’s going to be an older heroine, and I know she’s widowed. I know she runs a bed and breakfast in a small town in central Alberta. So then it’s finding the right hero. And I started that by saying a simple “What if?” What if she’s put in a situation with the kind of man she’s most afraid of? And the idea was born.

Once I do that, I cast my characters. Not all people are fans of this technique, but for me I find it anchors an image, an impression. And it’s more than just finding the right PERSON. You have to find the right look. You can have two pictures of the same man or woman, and one will work and one won’t. The casting pictures are a starting point for me only. ALWAYS…and I do mean every single time…my characters take on a life of their own. They have quirks that are all theirs. Body language, the sound of their voice that you hear as you’re writing dialogue. And that is how it should be. To be “true” 100% to your casting pictures or any preconceptions (like an actor in a particular role) runs the risk of creating one-dimensional characters. And you sure don’t want that!

I’ve cast both my characters for this book that I’ve tentatively titled “Falling for the Marshal”. I’ll introduce you to Maggie Gardner, 42, widow and business owner with a talent for making her guests feel special, and Nate Griffith, US Marshal, her latest lodger…



Come back tomorrow for the next step….research!

 

Know Your Characters!

Janet asked a question in my comments section on yesterday's post, and because I want to answer, I'm going to talk about it today and save research for another day.

She asked, Donna, do you do all that goal motivation and conflict thing (outer and inner charts as advised by Deb Dixon) or do you just start exploring your characters' situation and see where that takes you?

That's a really good question because Goal, Motivation and Conflict are what keeps your story going. You can have two characters but not care a jot about the story if there's no conflict. I don't do charts, in fact I don't even really sit down and say, "OK, what's the GMC for my hero/heroine?" I'm more a "explore the character's situation and see where that takes me."

But it's not that simple, not at all. It's more than a situation. And that's where I have the most fun. Characters need to be full people to me, with a past, a present, and a future. If you do the legwork, the GMC will smack you in the face! Or it should. If you know your characters inside and out, what makes them tick...then you're going to know what they want. (Goal) You're going to know WHY they want it (motivation) and you're going to know exactly what the opposite character is going to do to get in the way of that (conflict). Delving deeper into conflict, you might know reasons why what the character wants is in conflict with their greatest fears (internal conflict). And when you look at your basic plot, you're going to have other elements that will serve to keep them apart (external conflict).

So it all comes down, for me anyway, to knowing your characters.

Now, this might not work if you're writing something longer than series contemporary. Or what if you're writing romantic suspense? Let's face it. Romance as a line is a character based line. There's not a lot of room for external plot, and I'll tackle plot on another day. We'll just leave it now with the recognition that some genres/subgenres are more reliant on external plot than others. But even so, you STILL need to know your characters. I recently read The DaVinci Code and Angels and Demons. I enjoyed both, and probably should have read Angels and Demons first because I learned a lot more about Robert Langdon in that book. Still...I felt both books were short on character development.

When you know your characters, you not only know what they want, why, and what's going to stand in their way, but you know little things. Perhaps things that they've said, or how they'll react to a certain situation. Tiny details like their favourite colour or food that aren't necessarily important but can add that little extra bit of SOMETHING to your story. Helping it move from ordinary to vivid, rich and personal. It helps make your characters memorable. And it's important to remember that even after doing all that work, sometimes your characters will show you things about themselves that you didn't even know. For example, in writing the last few chapters of Marriage at Circle M, my hero, Mike, realized something about the heroine that totally threw me for a loop - but made perfect sense and added another layer of conflict that brought SO much together.

So how do I go about meeting my characters? Some people do interviews, but that's not really worked for me. I start with an image - hence the casting yesterday - and then I use a worksheet straight from Kate Walker's 12 Point Guide to Writing Romance. Questions like What do they have that they value most in the world? What trait do they most want to keep hidden from the world can be really illuminating. And many of your answers may never see the light of day in your manuscript. But YOU know, and if YOU know, it'll come across in your story. Then as I go along, my critique partner will ask questions. Tough ones. Each one I think about makes my character more rounded.

Your characters won't just be on the page, but they'll LIVE. And for me, that's the whole point.

 

Research

Today's post won't be super long, because IMO you shouldn't over do research.

Did that get your attention? I hope so. Because research IS necessary. And it can be annoying and tedious or great fun. Or a blend of both. For sake of familiarity, I'm going to stick with research for what I write - contemporary romance. If you are writing suspense, you need to research things like forensics. Procedure. Possibly even profiling. And ask my crit partner Michelle Styles about research for historicals. I for one, don't know how she does it. But contemporary is different.

The bulk of any research I do is based mostly on two things. 1. Where the story is taking place, and 2. The professions of the characters. My theory is you will do all your research and approximately 10% will actually make it into you story.

Setting: This can be fun or an utter drag. And since I'm going to tackle setting in a future post, I'll give you the lowdown on what you need to know. If you're creating your own town, you need to model it after something in the nearby area. If you're setting your book on the US East Coast, things are going to look a little different than they do in, say, the midwest. Once you have the basics, though, you can create whatever you want to go in your town or city.

If you're basing your story in a real place, however, you need to be a little more accurate. My first 2 Romances are set in and around the town of Sundre in Alberta. I know much more about Sundre than ever makes it into the book. But little details...for example, the main drag is actually Main Avenue and not Main Street - those all add authenticity. And researching the town was fun. It's about an hour and a half away, so I made a few visits, visited the museum, talked to a lady at the town office, and took my kids on a picnic. :-) I also visited the town website and googled Sundre, looking for interesting pictures and happenings. I kept my description of the rodeo vague, but there IS a pro-rodeo there every June. Those are researched details that made it in.

The bulk of my research is professions. Being a farm girl, the ranch thing wasn't too difficult. But with the book I just handed in, my hero was a former sniper in the Canadian Military. And this is where the internet community comes in really handy. I had questions ranging from uniforms to rank to equipment...and after putting out a call on e-harlequin, was contacted by a WONDERFUL resource who answered all my questions. In fact, I wasn't completely sure how the book was going to end until I brainstormed with Doug. But I ran into a problem. I really wanted to get the details right, so I read several articles on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. I read a book on Peace Keeping and another on the Friendly Fire incident a few years back in Afghanistan. Plus all my e-mails back and forth to Doug and his wife. And there were times that the details simply just started to take over.  The whole idea was so fascinating to me that I got carried away, and I simply had to stop, cut some things, rediscover my focus.

The good news is that I learned a lot from the draft of Home Fires. Mostly about what NOT to do. Just ask my CP, I worked her like a dog. Now, I'm starting a new story and this one is a US Marshal. I have a research source again - a friend who is a Marshal in the States. But while getting the information is wonderful and frankly really interesting, I know I have to use a much lighter hand in the new book. And that leads into the topic of focus, which we'll discuss once we get into the actual writing and the meat of the thing.

On a side note....I don't have time to find my ticker thingy but I lost 4 lbs in January. Slow, but steady I guess. At least it's going in the right direction.

Setting

I've read lots and heard many writers talk about setting at length. And you know what? It doesn't really intrigue me. That sounds awful, I know. But I don't let setting have too much power. For me, the focus needs to be on my protagonists and the rest need to support that. Supporting role ONLY.

We'll talk about Hired By The Cowboy and Marriage at Circle M first, as they are my first 2 Harlequin Romances and are set in the same place.

When Connor and Alex meet, it's in the city, and they are strangers. It's a very different world from the ranch, and when Alex first goes to Windover Ranch, Connor suddenly seems to make sense. The pace is different. The space is wide open and isolated. The setting for the book isn't so much Sundre, but Windover. And the house itself serves not only as a setting but as a symbol to Alex. It symbolizes a life she's never had before, a life she wants but one that is still just beyond her reach.

Use your settings to enhance your characters and storyline.

I used the same setting for Marriage at Circle M, but the feel is different. For one thing, Mike is building his OWN house on Windover land. There is a little more of the small town.

Choosing the right spot for your story to take place, and getting little details right to enhance your story, adds another vivid layer and will contribute to making your book come alive. Yet there's one aspect of setting we haven't talked about yet, and that's WHEN your story takes place.

This is even more important to me, I think. Choosing what time of year my story takes place is central. Could you write the same story in another season? Think about it. If you did, would it be the same story? What is it about the season you've chosen that makes it the RIGHT time?

I set HBTC in early summer. The timing was perfect, IMO. Spring was over, the days were unseasonally warm (as often happens here in May/June). Things were blooming to life...the hay, the garden, Alex's baby was growing inside her...their feelings were blooming too. Then, the rodeo is always late June, so May/June/July were the perfect months for the story to take place.

Marriage at Circle M, on the other hand, wasn't about blooming. It was about wooing and healing, and I used the mellow, golden warmth of autumn. Lazy sunny days and cool nights. It also fell over Thanksgiving (Canadian, which is early October) which added another element. Could I have set it in spring, or winter? Maybe. But I honestly don't think those seasons would have blended with the characters and their development the same way that using the fall did. In fact, I'd wager that if I wrote the same book over, using the same characters and setting but changing the season to late winter, I'd actually have a different book.

Think about books you've read, written or the one you're currently writing. Is the setting in the foreground or background? Is it subtly working over time? Which season are you in...and how does that enhance the plot/character development? For me, working on setting is as easy as being aware of it. If I work too hard at it, it takes over. If I'm merely aware of how it SHOULD function, it seems to find its proper place in the balance of the book. I use the 90/10 rule like I do with research. 90% of what I know stays out. The other 10% goes in and does its job.

 

Plot

I wasn't going to talk about plot at all, but I will touch on it briefly since it will tie in to my next topic, which is going to be BEGINNINGS.

For Harlequin Romance, (and I emphasize this because as I stated before, other types of writing demand heavier plots)this is my rule: External conflict: BAAAAAD. Internal conflict: GOOOOOD. The book I sent them BEFORE Hired By The Cowboy sold, came back as relying to heavily on external elements. It's what I guess you'd call "contrived situations". Don't throw external monkey wrenches in and have your characters react. Let the conflict come from within.

Of course, not all external conflict is bad. You DO need to have a plot. But you know, plot is minimal. In thinking of the Bella Brides series, each book has the underlying plot of the Valentine restaurants "directing" things. And each book has its own hook that gets the ball rolling. But is that the focus of the book? Nuh uh. First and foremost, as always, the characters and their internal conflict drive the book.

Even is there is an external element, it all comes down to the STORY being about how the characters deal with it. For example, in Hired By The Cowboy, Connor is about to lose the family ranch. The reason why is external. How he deals with that information, though, forms the crux of his conflict. Alex is pregnant and alone. She is running out of options. External. But how she chooses to deal with that, the way her character thinks and feels as she goes on her own journey through the book, is what carries her character.

I think I'll summarize my thoughts on plot with this...WHAT happens in the book is simply a platform for the characters to fall in love, to grow, to get to their HEA.

 

Beginnings

Beginnings are one of the hardest things to get right. I bet if I surveyed a pretty wide swath of romance authors, they'd say that they spend more time on those first three chapters than at any other point in the book. They will probably also admit that those three change more than any other section as well.

Why? My opinion is that it's because those beginnings are the foundation upon which your book is built. Weak foundation...boy, are you going to be doing a lot of patch-up work later. But you make your opening chapters solid, and even when things go wrong, you have a solid foundation to go back to.

Already I am having to backtrack - and I just finished the draft of chapter one. And you know what? This is another reason why KNOWING YOUR CHARACTERS is so important. Chapter one was flat. I knew it, my CP confirmed it. Motivations are missing, especially for my heroine. Now...I thought for a while, considered a suggestion she made, and it started taking shape in my mind. My heroine now has a whole other level of backstory. Boys and girls, I was only 14 pages in and already I'd made a pretty big mistake.

But this is what opening chapters are for. You learn right away whether or not your conflict will be sustainable. You gather more insight into motivations as you "meet" your characters, not only in your background work but as they interact with EACH OTHER. You get the foundation down. Then after the whole book is drafted, and I do the layering, I know a lot more than I did at the beginning. So most of my layering happens in the front end - I'd guess probably chapters 1-6.

Laying a strong foundation isn't easy. You need to introduce your characters. You need to have them TOGETHER. You need to show them feeling attraction and also introduce your conflict. You have to add in elements of backstory. But it's early days. So you have to do all of this carefully...while keeping the PACE going. It's one huge balancing act and that's probably why we spend so much bloody time on it.

I send my partial mss to my editor now with a caveat: "Here it is, but I'm sure it'll change by the end." I don't mean rewritten, but layers will be added. As I go through, there will be more depth. Sending the partial means if there are any gaping holes or serious flaws, they are brought to light right away. So far I haven't had that happen, thank goodness. I credit most of that to my CP, who has a great eye and points out those things right away. Like she did this morning. So now I'm off to revise my chapter and move forward into chapter two, knowing that first building block is a lot more solid.

 

Voice

At this point you've started your book. You know who your characters are, you know your basic plot, and you've begun crafting those annoying opening chapters that need to work SO very hard.

You will probably want to shoot me for saying it all doesn't matter at all without voice.

I should be working on revisions right now - they came yesterday - but I am writing this partially because of them, not in spite of. My revisions are fairly substantial, perhaps a little more than I expected, in some ways harder and in others, not so much. But even though I understand and even expected the comments made, it does not mean they are easy fixes. They make sense, but they are not changes I can make in a day or two.

Then, last night, I went to my local RWA chapter meeting and the topic was on voice.

What a difficult topic! How do you define it? The speaker read pieces that several writers had sent her. And each perspective was as different as, well, that person's voice! LOL. But perhaps the simplest definition I can give you is this...voice is YOUR personality, ON THE PAGE.

This doesn't mean your heroine is a copy of you. But it is a blend of many things. It's the way you see the world, your personality, the language you use, the rhythm of your language all rolled up into one package that is as individual as you are. When you read an author with a strong voice, you will recognize that voice over and over again. Some think that you need to let go of all the rules in order to let your voice shine through. Others think that you need to know craft before your voice can find the proper place in your writing. It's all very confusing.

I'll tell you what I think, and how it worked for me.

I think voice happens when you turn off your internal editor and you immerse yourself in your characters. I think you sometimes need to stop thinking so much about HOW to write the story, what the rules are, and just write it. That being said, I think you need to know the rules, be comfortable with the rules, and the boundaries so that unconsciously you can let your voice free without causing complete anarchy. :-) Your book is your child. Children thrive on structure...because then they are secure enough to take chances, explore freedoms. Interesting, isn't it!

In order for this to happen, you have to write, and write a lot. And you might not understand voice very much until you find it and have that "aha!" moment! Now, just like there are some people who sell their first book, some people find their voice right away. But I think for the majority of writers this takes some time and practice. For me it was book 4. Now pay attention: my first sale was I believe, book 8. I hit a groove with book 4 and it was the first book that got a full request. The other thing that happened with book 4 is that I knew where I needed to be targeting my work - Harlequin Romance. I recognized the boundaries, the rules, and the style of my writing enough to clue in to where it probably belonged. It was also at the point in my life where I think I finally grew up enough to be comfortable with myself, and that confidence spilled over into my writing I think.

That book is cringeworthy now, IMO, but it served a huge purpose. My voice kept developing as my craft evolved and I wrote, wrote, wrote - until I got to a point where I was writing publishable material.

Let's put this in present tense now. I took some big risks with Home Fires. First of all, I picked a topic that's not so easy. Then I gave myself a difficult hero, very different from my first two cowboy heroes. I struggled with this ms from pretty much day one. And when revisions came, they were not unexpected, but they ARE fairly heavy.

I asked my editor a question about the ending which will be changing, and then proposed a new take on it. Her response was thanking me for running with the idea and making it my own. And she also said everything was totally fixable.

Which brings me back to something I said last night - You can fix everything, but you can't fix voice. Making it my own means making changes in my own individual way and it's something I'm learning I'm fairly good at. Thank goodness! The mechanics of the story can be fixed. The most important thing is to fix them in your own voice, with your own stamp of individuality so you don't edit that spark right out of your story.

As you're writing your current project, read it out loud. Does the dialogue sound comfortable to you? Do your words flow off your tongue, or have you used vocabulary you THINK you should, rather than what comes naturally? All that is part of your voice.

My editor's note, combined with last night's meeting made me feel so much more confident about making these changes. Because the changes are just mechanics. Who I am on the page? That's just fine. :-)

Pace

The problem with so many elements to consider is that they are so intrinsically blended it is hard to talk about one without discussing another. When I think of pacing, it’s impossible to isolate it from things like plot, conflict and voice. Or even setting, POV, backstory or character development. Because pacing is the “speed” of your manuscript as a whole.

With pacing, the important thing to remember is that you want to maintain what we call “PTQ”, or Page Turning Quality. If you’ve ever read a story where you’ve found yourself skipping over chunks of print, you know that you’ve found a spot where the pacing has slipped and needs to pick up. Chances are this is not dialogue. Or if it is, it’s a circular type discussion where the characters seem to go around and around and don’t move on.

More likely it is narrative that is bogging things down. Long paragraphs, description without action, a backstory dump. Those things do happen. And when authors hear the term “cutting for pace” we know that most likely this is what we’ve done.

How do you avoid lags in pacing? There are several ways I think and we’ll touch on a few briefly.

First, keep things moving. Instead of describing things in paragraphs of lovely imagery, why not let your characters do it for you? In HIRED BY THE COWBOY, I don’t TELL you what Windover Ranch looks like. You see it through Alex’s eyes as she arrives for the first time. This method works double time – not only are you not putting in a huge chunk of description, but the way your character sees it also tells you something about THEM.

Also, use active verbs. That puts the reader into the immediate present and what’s going on, instead of being separated by degrees by passive language.

Avoid long sections of introspection. In character driven novels, there is introspection everywhere you turn. But it needs to be within an active scene. It doesn’t work to make your heroine have an hour long cup of tea to sit and think about things. Those thoughts should be in direct action/reaction to whatever else is going on….in your plot and conflict.

Of course, there is an ebb and flow to writing. Some writers run at a breakneck pace and hardly pause for breath. I remember reading The DaVinci Code and feeling that way and it really worked. Oddly enough I thought the pacing was the biggest flaw in the prequel, Angels and Demons. Suspense novels probably have tighter pacing to keep you on the edge of your seat. But even then, there are usually spots where the protagonists slow down and sleep, or have a beer, or order a pizza. If I’ve had a particularly active scene, the next one might slow things down a little. And as you write more, you’ll discover that you have your own rhythm to how you structure your novel, your chapters, your scenes and even your paragraphs (this is how voice ties in).

The other thing I’ve found in writing for the Romance line is that while most people are told to pick up the pace, as I’m writing I need to slow down. I always add 5-10k to the first draft through layering and revisions. In the romance line, this equals 10 – 20% of the total word count. That’s significant. And while many times the urge is to get through THIS scene so I can move on to the next, I need to take it like a several course meal. Stop and enjoy the course I’m in. Savour it, if you will. Explore the nuances of flavours throughout. Revel in it. Then, cleanse my palette and move on to the next course.

Now I’m hungry. So I think that will wrap things about with PACE as this has gone on much longer than I anticipated. I’m going to make something to eat! Isn’t the power of suggestion great?

 

Sexual Tension

Ah, sexual tension. A huge contributor to PTQ and what we all wait for with breathless anticipation. Those moments where your stomach lifts and your heart pounds as the hero and heroine discover each other.

Sexual tension can have very little to do with actual sex. I'm writing for the Romance line, which means the bedroom door is closed at all times. But that doesn't mean my characters aren't attracted. It doesn't mean they don't WANT each other. Of course they do!

Sometimes this is easy to accomplish and sometimes much more difficult. It depends on your characters and their situation, when all is said and done. If I look at my characters in Marriage at Circle M, it was a snap. Grace and Mike already knew each other. They'd even dated as teens. She'd always had a thing for him, so it was no problem injecting tension. Besides, Mike is hot. LOL. Mike will be a favorite hero of mine for a long time to come, I think.

If you look at my current WIP, though, it's different. Nate and Maggie have never met before page one. They are complete strangers. So not only do I have to do the "getting to know you" stuff, I have to also be thinking of their romance right away. It's proving to be a bit tricky when all is said and done.

Sexual tension can be words said, looks exchanged, meaningless touches that are suddenly meaningful. I read Barb Hannay's "Claiming the Cattleman's Heart" on the weekend and I'm going to give you an example:

The pads of his thumbs touched the bare skin of her collarbone, and every cell in her strained for more.

"Your hands are beautiful, Daniel," she told him in a heated, husky whisper. "And I want them. I want them all over me."


Whooooeeeee! For a non-sex series, this really says it all, doesn't it!

Sexual tension is also seeing your characters through the other character's eyes. I'm thinking of a section of Hired By The Cowboy, where Connor is annoying the living hell out of Alex. She's pregnant and alone and trying to do what's best for her baby, and he's come back to find her because he wants to discuss "something." She doesn't want another complication...

"When his eyes met hers across the hazy room she knew she was right. He smiled, a lazy, melting smile, and she braced herself. Men who smiled like that were deadly. And the last thing she needed was a distraction as lethal as Connor Madsen."

Bear in mind these examples are from the first 1/3 of the book...when my characters hardly really know each other. Before it even makes sense, they are attracted to each other. And it's a complication (isn't it always??? :-) ) Take a scene from a chapter later:

"Maybe we'll drive each other crazy and you'll be glad to be rid of me." She tried a cocky smile, but faltered at the look in his eyes as they stopped at the edge of the dirt road.

He turned to face her, his warm gaze delving into hers, drawing her in and making her thoughts drift away on the evening breeze. His hand lifted to her cheek. "I think there's a very good chance you're going to drive me crazy," he murmured, his thumb stroking her cheek tenderly.

She stepped back in alarm, her face burning from the intimate touch and the clear meaning of his words. She left his hand hanging in thin air. A truck approached and spun past them, stirring up loose gravel and clouds of dust.

When the air cleared they said nothing, but crossed the road and made their way up the lane.


One other thing to note while writing sexual tension. Look at the words used. Depending on the tone of the book, they might be more direct (explicit books will sound different than ones with a less-explicit tone) but I think most of the time you'll notice words like warm, hot, soft, lazy, silky, urgent...seduction is warm. Even if "cold" type words are used I'd be willing to bet that they are in juxtaposition to hot ones.

And lastly, don't be shy with using it. Even in a line like Romance, I try to have some level of sexual tension on every page. Whether it's my heroine's reaction to his voice on the answering machine or they way he looks at her; the way they are thrown together and her lips are close enough to kiss...the accidental brushing of their fingertips as they reach for the remote at the same time...if these things sound cliche, they probably are. But cliches do happen for a reason. Think back to when you first started dating your significant other. Looks and touches, all amplified by the newness of discovering each other.

What are some of your favorite books, and how did that author develop the sexual tension?

 

Saggy Middles, aka Focus

Oh, the dreaded Saggy Middle. And I'm not talking about the one at your waist, despite yesterday's PHS blog. :-) I'm talking about those middle chapters of your book, where everything either seems to go flat and you fight for every word.

Part of the problem is that at least for me, I see what I've done with the partial, I see the end, and I worry that how they get there will leave me 20k short of my 50-55k novel. It's getting a little better, as now I am perfectly fine with finishing a first draft of 42-43 k. I always add a good 5k in layering, and then my editor's revisions tend to add a few more thousand - even though I am always amazed since I cut as well as add.

But that pressure is still there. Do I have enough conflict to maintain the pace?

The only way to defeat the saggy middle is to write your way through it. And the key to this is focus.

You need to focus hard on a few things. First of all, a romance is the character's journey, so let them take that journey. As I mentioned before in pacing, I need to savour scenes rather than let them play out too fast. If you've done your character work at the beginning, your characters are so deep that you may actually discover little bits of inner conflict coming out that you didn't even expect.

You also need to focus on the romance. You need to ask yourself...does this scene forward the romance (or deepen the conflict keeping them apart)? Don't lose sight of what you need to be doing.

And keep your scenes active. Nothing kills a pace faster, or sets up saggy-middle-alarms like endless cups of tea in the kitchen. Don't worry about not having enough by the time you get to the end. You will. And this is a first draft so after you're done, you can go back and insert scenes that you know you need and layer. I used to think - no way. I can't add in that much. But I can and do.

My CP is a great one for e-mailing me and saying, Chapter so and so needs to be 2 chapters and I need to insert a scene. My only regret is often I don't get to see those scenes until I get the published book. :-) But you know, I did it in my last book too. I'd jumped too far ahead...I needed to go back and add a few bits that helped a nice, slow build of the romance.

And most of all, remember, once you get through the middle you can race for the end. And once you reach the end, well, there's a saying that hindsight is 20/20. You'll see what you've missed and you can fix it. Just write it and focus and don't let the fact that it's the middle paralyze you.

 

The Little Things

I'm going to pause for a moment for a less structured topic and one that will take more thought on your part and less on mine. I've titled it "The Little Things", but what I really want you to do is think of little things in books you've read that have particularly grabbed your attention - good and bad.

I was thinking about this as I was walking home from the school run today. There was a woman crossing the street in the skinniest heels I'd ever seen, and she didn't make her way over the grass to the sidewalk. I can only assume this was because her heels would have stuck into the ground.

I was reminded of a beginning of a LaVyrle Spencer book where the heroine has attended her husband's funeral and she is aware of the sensation of her heels sinking into the soft earth.

I don't remember everything from that book, but I remember that image. I am like that with a lot of books. Little things that stand out as really, really memorable. It could be a line of dialogue, an image, a feeling.

And the reverse can happen too. I can read a book and find something that really turns me off. Thankfully this doesn't happen as often as the lovely aha! moments.

So here's where you come in. Take some time and think about books you've read. What is memorable, good and bad, and why?

Then look at your own writing. Try your best to be objective. What do you do well? Not so well?

Play to your strengths and work on your weaknesses.

Knowing what you do well - and exploiting it - is what might pull you out of the slush pile for another look. And improving on your weak spots might mean STAYING out of the slush pile - for good.

 

The END

You're reaching the last third of your book and you think everything should just fall into place. So why isn't it?

I said in the beginning, all three areas have their own challenges. And endings are no different. You're getting close to that happily ever after and some of the most exciting parts of the book are imminent. But somehow...it's not any easier.

THE BLACK MOMENT. Where this falls depends on your characters and their journey. Perhaps the black moment, that space in time where all is lost, happens for both your characters at the same time. Perhaps the heroine has hers and the hero has his at different times (which is often how I work). Regardless, you have to get it right. You have to plug it FULL of emotion so it's leaking out the sides. You have to devastate your characters. If you split your Black Moments, one might happen closer to the middle and the other within the last couple of chapters.

In Hired By The Cowboy, the character's black moments happen not in the same scene but in consecutive scenes, so pretty much at the same time.

In Marriage At Circle M, though, Mike's black moment is different from Grace's and it was very right for the characters and the situation. The same thing with book three- the hero's black moment comes first, then the heroine's.

But it doesn't matter when it happens as long as it's in the right place and is properly devastating.

Then...then you have to put it all back together again. The ending has to be satisfying, so you need to ask yourself a few questions and allow yourself to have a few passes at it to get it complete.

1. Look at your character's conflict. Has it been resolved? And here's the biggie - has it been resolved by the growth of BOTH characters?

I mention this particularly because I had to revise the ending of my latest because the hero hadn't shown enough personal growth. My editor was absolutely right and I saw that as soon as I started "fixing" it.

2. Have you tied up loose ends? There are always little plot points that you weave throughout your story, after all that's what's given it great depth so far. Make sure you don't leave any of these dangling. If you are writing a series it is different. I read Blood Secrets lately which is the first of three "Valorian Chronicles". The characters got their HEA - but the external plot feeds through all the books, so it was a great blend of satisfying ending and OMG I need to buy the next to find out what happens.

3. The HEA - this scene is what we've been waiting for the whole book. The part where we know all is well. That together they are stronger than apart. That they are meant to be and confess all. Don't scrimp on it. Infuse it with emotion and passion and commitment.

Then, write THE END and go out and celebrate! You did it! You finished your story. All that's left is prettying it up - or is it?

 

Editing

Now you've finished your first draft, and you're incredibly relieved. The bones of your story are down. You've reached the end.

Now it's time to fix and polish so it's ready to send.

The way I used to edit is very different from the way I edit now. Honestly I think it's a skill that's developed over time. The more you write, the better you become, the more you can tell what's working and what's not. What I used to consider "edits" is now more of a polishing stage.

When I edit, I get to the end and if there are scenes that need to be added, I go back and add them where I think they need to be. Once I've done that, I start at the beginning and work my way through. I look for certain things...is my hero strong. Is my conflict solid. I layer a lot. This means I add physical and emotional beats. By the end of the story, I usually have a handful of motivation and conflict layers that I didn't exploit enough in the first half, so the bulk of my layering goes there. This is where my dialogue gets fleshed out so that the scene is fully set.

When I finish a book now, I'm usually a good 4-7k off for word count. During edits and layering, I add 3-5k. I've learned that I send a book in a little short and once my editor is finished with it, I feel like it's tighter and I've cut a bunch of stuff and I end up solidly in the middle of the 5k spread for word count - right on the money.

Once you've gone through and fixed what needs fixing - keeping focus on the romance, making sure the pace is fluid and keeps moving, and that your characters have behaved in the appropriate way for their character and arc, you do a polishing round.

When you polish, you should be looking for repetitive words, repetitive actions, grammar and spelling mistakes, the odd sentence that just seems to fit. This is about prettying up your ms, because now all the heavy work is done.

The best advice I can give is DON'T BE AFRAID TO EDIT. Don't let the delete key scare you. Be brave and do what needs to be done. If you get to a point where you're thoroughly sick of the manuscript or just can't see anymore what needs to be changed, it's time to let an editor have a go.

 

Queries, Synopses and Partials

There is a ton of information out there about submitting your manuscript, yet one of the most frequently asked questions are regarding how to submit once your ms is ready.

THE QUERY LETTER

This is a business letter so you want it to be professional. No funky fonts, or off the wall paper choices, that sort of thing. You want it to have a personal flavour so there's some sense of who you are, but mainly you are introducing yourself and your work so you want it to remain professional.

Format it like a business letter. The way I always formatted it was with an introductory paragraph: my name, the title of the book (either underlined or in all caps), the target (either audience or line, depending on what you write)and the approximate word count.

My next paragraph would be a hook-y type blurb about the book.

The third paragraph contained background information on me. This would include publishing credits or other pertinent information. Even something like "My job as a doctor inspired me to write this medical about xyz" or whatever.

Again, you're selling your ms but also yourself.

Queries should be no longer than one page.

THE SYNOPSIS

Depending on where you're sending your ms, a very general rule of thumb would be 2 pages single spaced for most category length novels. If you write single title or longer (75k +) series, you could probably expand that. Right now, my editor gets a one-page synopsis. Condensing it down is hard, so here's what you need.

You need to hit the main points only. You need to give a feeling for your characters, the conflict, their motivations and a brief roadmap of how they get there. You also need to include the resolution - how they reach their happy ending. DON'T LEAVE THIS OUT. The editor is going to want to know how you wound this up. Please don't put "to see how it ends, you'll need to read the rest of the story!" Editors don't have time for that. They need to see at a glance that what you've done works.

PARTIALS

Some agents/publishers/lines will allow you to send a sample of your work - usually 3 chapters or what we call a "partial". Another one of the most-oft asked questions is about formatting.

Clear, good sized font. So TNR 12 or Courier New 12 seem to be the two standards. I know one of my publishers uses Bookman Old Style a lot, but I don't use it in my every day work or sending to my editor at Harlequin. DOUBLE SPACE. If an editor is going to the time and effort to read your work, don't give her an eye-strain headache. Number your pages in the top right and have a header at the top with the ms title and your name. You should also have a cover page, with the ms title and your name front and centre. When I send mine, to the bottom left I have my contact information - mailing address, e-mail and phone number - and on the right I put who it's going to and the approximate word count.

With a partial you can clip it together. Do NOT staple. If you get a request to see all the work, hold it together with elastic bands.

If you go to www.eharlequin.com/learntowrite you should be able to find examples of the above, or heck do a google search. There are lots of resources out there.

 

What's Next? 

I’m going to shoot straight from the hip and give you the basic, unvarnished truth.

You’ve submitted.  You’ll likely get a rejection.  That’s just the numbers, and I’m sorry but it’s true.  That doesn’t mean you give up.  It means you get determined.

Wait times vary.  But in all honesty, don’t expect anything back for 3-4 months.  MINIMUM.  On a query, you should certainly hear within this time frame, and partials too for the most part.  On a partial, if you haven’t heard anything by the six month mark, send and e-mail if you have a contact or make a polite, short phone call to make sure your ms is still there.

If you’re blessed to get feedback with rejections, pay attention because editors don’t waste time giving feedback unless they see something promising in your writing.  If it sounds like a form letter, it probably is, so don’t dissect it and angst over it.  File it and move on.

If you’re lucky enough to get a request for the full manuscript, make another short cover letter referring to the request, and all pertinent information about the submission.  My cover letters for fulls were usually one simple paragraph.  “Please find enclosed my manuscript whatever as requested in your letter of….”  MAKE SURE YOU HAVE ALL YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION included.  Print out your ms on regular paper, complete with cover page, bind it with an elastic, and my recommendation is to send it in tyvek envelopes.  Unless you’re writing Single Titles in which case a document box might work best.  Make sure that you put in SASE’s too – in queries as well as fulls.  If it is going to another country, you can buy IRC’s – International Reply Coupons – at the post office.  Most places don’t send back the ms unless you request – notice I said MOST not ALL – so one should be sufficient to reply.  CHECK THE PUBLISHERS GUIDELINES BEFORE SENDING ANYTHING.  Different publishers want different things, and while my advice is rule of thumb sort of things, not everyone is the same.

I’ve had wait times on fulls from 2 weeks to 18 months, but again after 6 months I think it’s ok to follow up, unless they’ve said otherwise.

Now…what happens?

  1. You could get a form rejection

  2. You could get a rejection with feedback (solid gold, people.  Listen up.)

  3. You could get revisions

  4. You could sell, this is highly unlikely without going through (3) first.

If you get revisions, don’t panic.  Read the letter, file it, take it out and read it again, don’t panic, and give yourself time to absorb what the editor is asking of you.  At first it might seem like a HUGE job.  But remember – you only have to revise one page at a time.  And be flexible.  Editors know what they are doing.  You need to trust that editor and give her what she wants using your own unique voice.  And you only need to fix one page at a time.  It’s okay.  You’ll get through it.  It’s natural to worry you haven’t done it right but revisions are a great learning experience, and look, it’s SO helpful when someone tells you exactly what needs fixing. 

My other recommendation is to do your revisions in a timely manner.  You don’t need to turn them around in 24 hours, but unless it’s a rewrite, you shouldn’t need more than a week, two tops.  Even with my last ms, which had substantial revisions, I had it back to her in 8 days.  Opportunity is knocking.  Don’t waste time! 

Then send your revisions back – whichever way the editor has asked (and most likely will be through e-mail).  Revision wait times can vary SO much.  In three books with Harlequin, I’ve waited as short as 24 hours and currently I’m at just over 4 weeks with my last.  It all depends on where you are in your editor’s schedule. 

If you don’t get asked for revisions, or if you have sent your revisions and are waiting, what do you do now? 

Well, you think about the next book.  You do up a proposal…even if you aren’t at the proposal sending stage yet, this is a good idea.  You outline a basic premise and characters for a story, or two, or three.  Then you pick one (after you’ve sold, your editor might do the picking FOR you) and you start all over again.  The best cure for waiting – bar none – is working on another project.  Think about it.  You wait 4 months for a rejection on a partial, but maybe you got some positive comments and a line like “we see promise in your writing and feel free to submit something else to us.”  Wouldn’t it be nice to have a new partial all ready to go?  Having one in the hopper is NOT to be underestimated.  With HIRED BY THE COWBOY, I was waiting to submit it while waiting to hear on THE GIRL MOST LIKELY.  When that full was rejected, but with feedback, I already had another ms ready to go and it sold.

 

You're Published - What To Expect

I recently did an article for my local RWA chapter on “You Got the Call. Now What?” In it I used quotes from several other newly-published friends about what was the hardest thing to adjust to. When you sell, it’s important to remember, you’re not alone. Others have, and are, going through the same thing. And I’ll touch on a few of the biggies so you don’t get the contract and get smacked in the head with reality without SOME warning.

First of all….enjoy the feeling and never lose that sense of excitement. 

Then, you should be prepared for being inundated with congratulations, invitations to join loops, places you “need” to be when you’re added to the “club”. My advice would be join. Try them out briefly, and decide which ones are most valuable. I can say right now that the ‘newbie’ loop that I joined was SO beneficial. Newbies from a few years ago are now helping out the newest additions and it is a wealth of great information.

If you don’t have an agent, you need to look at your contract yourself, and this is also where having friends in the know is good. You’ll know what you can and can’t negotiate, as well as little things to keep an eye out for.

Your contract is sent in, so now little things will crop up. You’ll likely have to send in an author bio, dedications, maybe dear reader letters…your editor will probably want to see what else you have on the go, you may get asked to fill out Art Fact Sheets. At this point you might be feeling quite overwhelmed even though the euphoria of having sold hasn’t worn off.

You need a website, copy edits arrive for you to do and send back in a ridiculously short amount of time, and you realize you haven’t written on a book in a month. People are squawking about self-promotion. The house looks like a tornado blew through and your kids have miraculously learned to make their own meals.

And suddenly, you realize you THOUGHT you were good at time management and you really had no idea.

It happens. It just does. Some handle it better than others, I was a mess. Not fall-apart-completely a mess, but certainly out of the zone. And it took about 4 months for me to get it together. It’s an adjustment, plain and simple. So give it time. Realize it happens, don’t be too hard on yourself, and let yourself settle into a routine.

The other thing with selling is that you may now have a deadline for book two. And you are excited until you put CHAPTER ONE at the top of the page and freeze.

What if you’re not good enough? What if you peaked with your sold book and you can’t duplicate that success…what if you’re nothing but a fluke?
Again – all part of the process and you simply have to write through it. It will be fine. Repeat this to yourself as often as needed. Personally I think my book 2 came out really strong and it’s my favourite I’ve written to date (like children, we shouldn’t have favourites but we sometimes do).

After that…get used to worry. I think realizing that nothing is guaranteed – that we still have to write books to a standard, and keep improving – keeps us on our toes and makes sure we don’t get lazy. You can’t assume every book is a done deal. Others will say, “Oh, it’ll sell, don’t worry, blah blah” but you still have that little bit of “I hope it’s good enough” in the back of your mind. It’s a pain, but I think it’s good for the writing.

The last thing….and this really has been the purpose of the whole Construction Zone series. ASK QUESTIONS. It’s really okay to ask someone who knows. It might be an editor, an agent, a writer friend, someone published. I’ve yet to meet an author who minded me asking a question. And I appreciate it so much (because you NEVER stop having questions) that I’m happy to return the favour if I can. And if I can’t – I can probably send you to someone who can.

I hope the series helped you in some way at some point. I know I’ve enjoyed putting it together and even learned new things along the way.


Question Period


QUESTION:  "Spotting unnecessary plot contrivances is quite difficult. Any thoughts on what questions we could ask about the event to help us decide if it's a contrivance or not?"

The easy answer is...is the event the direct result of something that's already happened. If no, look at it again. In other words, is it something that is happening TO your character causing a REACTION instead of PROACTION. Reactive characters...ones that react to WHAT is happening instead of being PROACTIVE (using their motivations) can be the death knell to your ms finding its way to publication.

Is the event out of the blue? Is everything going on swimmingly and then BAM! something happens? This is what I call monkey wrench syndrome. If you don't have enough conflict for your characters, you feel the need to throw a complication in their way...a monkey wrench into the works. I'm guilty of it. And these things are spotted a mile away, trust me.

Now..that's not to say you can't have ANY external plot. Something has got to put these two characters in the same place at the same time. And you CAN get away with a spot or two. It can add drama. I'll give you a cryptic sort of example, because I don't want to give away the ending of Hired By The Cowboy. But I do have an external event close to the ending and it brings things to a nice emotional pitch, I think. However, a few chapters earlier, I had to rewrite an entire scene, because it, added in with the other, made for too much external conflict. That scene changed so that what happened came from WITHIN my heroine, not from her REACTING to something else that happened. My editor was very astute making me change that.

I hope that helped.



QUESTION:  Donna, when you slip snippets of character backstory into chapter to give your writing a contemporary feel is it best to a)show it in dialogue eg: Character A says to h: 'I really worry about you. Eveyone one needs to relax every now and then...etc'Or b)have the author add it in a very short piece of telling: Since splitting up with X, h's life had been one long round of work. She'd kept telling herself it wouldn't be forever but somehow...etcOrc) have the character think it eg: yes, her life was completely dictated by her work. So what? Being a brain surgeon was a dream come true..etc

Well, Janet, you’re going to hate me for this, but I’m going to say all three.

After all, if you use only one method, things are going to be kind of boring, aren’t they? LOL

Part of this answer also depends on your voice. My local rwa chapter is having a talk on voice next week, so I think I’ll blog about it after that. Because voice is hard. But I’ll tell you a secret I realized while drafting Home Fires. My paragraphs have a rhythm. A way that I structure them, blending dialogue with emotional and physical beats and narrative. They have, I hope, a balance. That’s not to say in some bits there’s less of some and more of another…for example, you are naturally going to have areas that are snappier, heavier on dialogue and others that are thicker with narrative…that ebb and flow of pacing (ah yes, another topic!).
Vicki Hinze has a great article on backstory. In it she explains that you should blend the background with the action, and to choose details that bring a desired response to your reader, in other words, something that helps the reader relate to your character and understand their motivations. So that we know that even if they are doing the wrong thing, they are doing it for reasons that makes sense to them.
I’ve rustled up an example for you. In looking at it, I realize I use the dialogue to set the tone between Grace and Mike… from the WAY that she speaks to him, we realize they have a history. The emotional beats are her thoughts, and this makes up most of it. Her thoughts are tied to narrative…because we are firmly in her POV at the beginning.

These are the first few pages of Marriage at Circle M….and I’ve bolded the spots where I added in backstory. Sometimes I wasn’t sure if I should bold or not…and I think that’s a good thing because the backstory should blend in as seamlessly as possible.

When Mike Gardner came walking up the path in just that way, Grace knew she was in trouble.

And when he stopped at the foot of her stepladder, hooked his thumbs in his jeans pockets and squinted up at her, she gripped her paintbrush tighter so as not to drop it. Mike was all long, lazy strides and sexy smiles, and despite her best intentions, she’d never been able to remain immune to his charm. Not since she’d hit puberty, anyway.

“Mornin’, Grace,” the words didn’t exactly drawl, but were drawn out just enough to give that impression.

Grace straightened her shoulders and did her best to look nonchalant as she swiped another stripe of white paint over the window trim. “Hello, Mike.”

Great. Now why in the world did those two words come out all breathless, anyway?

She had to remember that it wasn’t all that long go that she’d made a fool of herself where Mike was concerned. It had been years since there had been anything between them. But she’d had a little too much punch, there’d been a little too much giggling and she’d blurted out one very ill-thought out sentence. She still felt the heat of her embarrassment and every time they met now, she did everything she could to assure him – to assure herself, even, that Mike Gardner was completely resistible. Lord knew he didn’t need her fawning over him the way the rest of the female population seemed to. Without thinking, she tucked an errant strand of blonde hair back behind her ear, leaving it streaked with paint.

“You’re up with the birds,” he commented, a lazy smile creeping up his cheek as she chanced a look down at him.

And you knew I would be, or you wouldn’t be here so early.” She pointedly checked her watch. “It’s seven-forty-six.”

“It is?” His chin flattened ever so slightly. “I’m sorry, I thought it was later.”

“You’ve likely been up and done chores already.”

“Yes.”

Darn him. She couldn’t just stand up on the stepladder like an idiot, carrying on a conversation that was barely holding its own. Besides, she was all too aware that his height, paired with her distance up the ladder put his line of vision right at her backside. She sighed, put her brush across the top of the paint-smeared can and took a step down – and her dew-slick sneaker slipped on the metal step.

His hands were there to catch her.

“Whoa, there.”

She shrugged off his touch. It felt far too strong and too good. “I’m not one of your horses, Mike.”

He laughed. “No ma’am. You sure aren’t.”

It wasn’t fair. She’d had a thing for Mike since she was fourteen, but he’d always treated her like a kid sister. An annoying one. For a brief time, when she’d been in high school, they’d been more. But that seemed a lifetime ago. For him to flirt now…weeks after she’d made a complete idiot of herself, it was too much. That one little slip of the lip was the only time she’d ever come close to telling him how she felt, and at the time he’d only laughed at her.

She was older…and far wiser now at twenty-seven. There was no room in her life for schoolgirl crushes. She planted her hands on her hips and stared him down. “Look, you obviously didn’t come around for idle chit-chat, so tell me what’s on your mind so I can get back to work.”

Mike had to turn away to hide his smile. She was good and irritated, he could tell. And besides that, she looked wonderful this morning, almost too good. Her blonde hair was tucked into some sort of strange clip, and little pieces tangled around her ears. Her eyes flashed at him now, icy blue with annoyance. Looking up that stepladder at her slim, tanned legs had almost made him forget why he was here. And steadying her with his arms as she’d slipped had wiped his brain clean of any other thoughts whatsoever. He liked the feel of his hands on her skin.

He stepped back, ignoring her jab, instead turning to survey the small yellow bungalow she called home…(I cut some description because it got line edited in the final version)

“You’re painting.”

She kept her eyes front as if refusing to look at him. “Your powers of deduction astound me. What tipped you off?”

He ignored that bit of sarcasm too. She had to be tired, after all. The drips down the side of her paint can were fresh; she’d obviously been at it a while before he showed up. And he knew for a fact that she’d been up late last night, because her lights had been on when he’d been on his way back from town at nearly one o’clock. He wished…he wished she didn’t have to work so hard for everything. But he was the last person who could make things better for her. At least for right now he was.

“How do you find time to do everything, Grace? Every time I see you you’re busy at something.”

By getting up at five a.m., she thought. Instead she shoved her hands in the pockets of her shorts. “It keeps me out of trouble.”

“Then I sure hate to ask what I’m about to.”

Mike was serious, she realized, pushing away the urge to use sarcasm as a shield against him. Normally he said nothing at all or what he did say was disarming and funny. But Grace had known him long enough to know when he was troubled. And the tone of his voice right now told her something was definitely going on. When he merely stared at her house longer, she wrinkled her brow and went to him, gently placing a paint-splattered hand on his forearm.

What’s wrong?”

I hope that helps, Janet. The odd sentence here and there can keep your pacing going, give the correct information, and avoid information dumps. FWIW, I got rid of a few dumps in this story upon revision…not pages and pages, but trickling it in as beats and thoughts works much better than a long paragraph of straight narrative. It comes down to showing it rather than telling us what we need to know.

 

QUESTION:  When the black moments happen at different points in the story for the hero and heroine, do you resolve them at different points as well? Or, does the one that occurred first take longer to resolve, with both getting resolution near the end?

You know, Patricia, sometimes my black moments aren't all that clear. Sometimes they are a little series of black moments that culminate into "how are they going to work this out?"

Now, in Hired By The Cowboy, my characters had their black moments really at the same time although they were apart. I'll risk spoilery type information here and scrimp on details, if that's ok. Basically Connor realises that he's lost everything....and discovers what he thought was most important to him isn't anymore. Alex has finally realized she loves him, and thinking him dead, realizes she'll never be able to tell him.

Marriage at Circle M was different and you'll see how it all has to do with the conflict. Grace's black moment comes early. She tells Mike her secret only half way through the book, destroying any hope she has of being with him as he wants the one thing she can't give him. Mike, on the other hand, has a black moment much later on, when he discovers he can't help Grace, that she has to make peace with things on her own. He has, by his actions, actually contributed to the problem and he feels completely helpless. He lashes out at her, destroying what is left of their friendship.

There are so many elements at work in MCM that when you get to the ending I think it's that much better. I still cry when I get there.

Now, in my latest, the hero's black moment is very clear, and it's first. He hits rock bottom, and it's only then, when he acknowledges it, that he can work his way back. The heroine doesn't see any way for them to work, so it takes some major convincing on Jonas's part.

So I guess my answer is, it depends. If a black moment comes early, it can be a source of conflict that carries the book through to the second black moment, and then both will be resolved at the end.

And sometimes, a black moment won't be resolved really at all. There are several books out there that show how the problem still exists...the victory is in how the characters deal with it, live with it, choose to go through it together.
 

 

 

  content © Donna Alward 2007 | design by NiNdeSpin